Board Committees

The Board has established the following principal Committees, each of which has written terms of reference (approved by the Board) setting out its authority and duties. Copies of the terms of reference can be viewed within each Committee section below. Hard copies can also be obtained from the Company Secretary. Contact details can be found here.

Steve Lucas

Steve Lucas, Chairman

Ann Grant

Ann Grant

Tutu Agyare

Tutu Agyare

Anne Drinkwater

Anne Drinkwater

Governance

Steve Lucas was appointed Audit Committee Chairman in May 2012 after David Williams' retirement from the Board on 16 May 2012. Steve, who is a Chartered Accountant, was Finance Director at National Grid plc from 2002 to 2010. It is a requirement of the UK Corporate Governance Code that at least one Committee member has recent and relevant financial experience. Steve Lucas therefore meets this requirement.

The Chief Financial Officer, the Group Internal Audit Manager, the General Manager Finance, the Deputy Company Secretary and representatives of the External Auditors are invited to attend each meeting of the Committee and participated in all of the meetings during 2012. The Chairman of the Board also attends meetings of the Committee by invitation and was present at all of the meetings in 2012. The external auditors have unrestricted access to the Committee Chairman.

In 2012, the Audit Committee met on five occasions. Meetings are scheduled to allow sufficient time to enable full discussion of key topics.

The Committee reviewed its terms of reference during the year. These are in line with best practice. The Audit Committee terms of reference can be accessed via the corporate website. The Board approved the terms of reference in December 2012.

Main responsibilities

The Committee fully discharged its responsibilities during the year. The following describes the Audit Committee’s main responsibilities and the work conducted in discharging these responsibilities:

Financial statements and formal announcements

Monitoring the integrity of the financial statements and formal announcements relating to the Group’s financial performance.

  • The Committee met with the external auditors as part of the full-year and half-year accounts approval process.
  • During this exercise the Committee considered the key audit risks identified as being significant to the 2012 accounts and the most appropriate treatment and disclosure of any new or judgemental matters identified during the audit and half-yearly review as well as any recommendations or observations made by the external auditors.

Reporting, policies and disclosures

Reviewing the significant financial reporting issues and accounting policies and disclosures in the financial reports.

  • The Group prepares financial statements under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The adoption of new and revised Standards and Interpretations during 2012 and their impact on the financial statements are described in the accounting policies.
  • The Audit Committee approved the scope of the work to be undertaken by the external auditors for half-year and year-end statutory audits and reviewed and discussed the external auditors’ final audit reports.

Internal controls and risk management

Reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s internal control procedures and risk management systems.

  • The Audit Committee reviewed the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control procedures and risk management systems through the work of the internal audit team and external auditors and through regular reporting by the business unit and corporate teams to the Board.

Internal audit requirements

Considering how the Group’s internal audit requirements shall be satisfied and making recommendations to the Board.

  • The Group Internal Audit Manager has direct access and responsibility to the Audit Committee. His main responsibilities include: evaluating and supporting the development of the Group’s overall control environment; operating efficiency and risk identification and management at operating, regional and corporate levels. In fulfilling his role, the Group Internal Audit Manager has direct access to the Committee without reference to Executive Management. During 2012, the Group Internal Audit Manager met with the Audit Committee Chairman without the presence of management to discuss the planning of Audit Committee meetings and to brief him on the results of the audits completed. The Group Internal Audit Manager also supported the development of Audit Committee meeting agendas with the Chairman with input from the Chief Financial Officer and General Manager Finance.
  • The Committee approved the programme of 2012 internal audit work aimed at addressing both financial and overall risk management objectives identified within the Group. Thirty-seven internal audit reviews were undertaken during the year, covering a range of financial and business processes in the Group’s main business units in London, Dublin and Cape Town, and the main operational locations in Ghana, Uganda and Kenya. Detailed results from these reviews were reported to management and in summary to the Audit Committee during the year. Recommendations made as a result of the work of Internal Audit are tracked for timely implementation and reported to the Audit Committee periodically. No significant weaknesses were identified as a result of risk management and internal controls reviews undertaken by Internal Audit during 2012. The Group also undertook regular audits of non-operated joint ventures under the supervision of business unit management and the Group Internal Audit Manager.
  • In addition, the Committee oversees the work of the independent reserves auditors ERCE and the arrangements in place for managing Information Technology risk relating to the Group’s critical information systems.

External auditors

Making recommendations to the Board on the appointment or re-appointment of the Group’s external auditors and overseeing the Board’s relationship with the external auditors and, where appropriate, the selection of new external auditors.

  • The UK Corporate Governance Code states that the Audit Committee should have primary responsibility for making a recommendation on the appointment, re-appointment or removal of the external auditors. On the basis of the review of external audit effectiveness, the Committee recommended to the Board that it recommends to shareholders the re-appointment of the auditors at the 2013 AGM.
  • The external auditor is required to rotate the audit partner responsible for the Group audit every five years. 2012 is the first year of the current lead audit partner’s tenure. The audit contract was last put out to tender in 2004. The Audit Committee acknowledges the new provision in the 2012 edition of the UK Corporate Governance Code in respect of audit tendering and the suggested transitional arrangements thereto. The new Code applies to the Company from 1 January 2013 and will be reported against in its 2013 Annual Report.
  • The Group’s external auditors are Deloitte LLP and the Audit Committee assessed the qualification, expertise and resources, and independence of the external auditors and the effectiveness of the audit process. This covered all aspects of the audit service provided by Deloitte LLP, including obtaining a report on the audit firm’s own internal quality control procedures and consideration of the audit firms’ annual transparency reports in line with the UK Corporate Governance Code. The Audit Committee also approved the external audit terms of engagement and remuneration. During the 2012 audit process, the Audit Committee Chairman met with Deloitte’s audit engagement partner without the presence of management.
  • As a result of these reviews, the Audit Committee considered the external audit process to be operating effectively.
  • The Committee closely monitors the level of audit and non-audit services they provide to the Group. Non-audit services are normally limited to assignments that are closely related to the annual audit or where the work is of such a nature that a detailed understanding of the Group is necessary. A policy for the engagement of the external auditors to supply non-audit services is in place to formalise these arrangements which requires Audit Committee approval for certain categories of work. This policy has been reviewed and updated in line with updated Audit Practice Board Ethical Standards and FRC Guidance to Audit Committees, and is available on the corporate website.
  • A breakdown of the fees paid to the external auditors in respect of audit and non-audit work is included in note 3 to the financial statements. In addition to processes put in place to ensure segregation of audit and non-audit roles, Deloitte LLP is required, as part of the assurance process in relation to the audit, to confirm to the Committee that they have both the appropriate independence and the objectivity to allow them to continue to serve the members of the Company. This confirmation was given and no matters of concern were identified by the Committee.

Whistle-blowing procedure

Ensuring that an effective whistle-blowing procedure is in place.

  • In line with best practice and to ensure Tullow works to the highest ethical standards, an independent whistle-blowing procedure has been in operation during the year to allow staff to confidentially raise any concerns about business practices. This procedure complements the established internal reporting process. The whistle-blowing policy is included in the revised Code of Business Conduct which is available on the corporate website. The Committee considers the whistle-blowing procedures to be appropriate for the size and scale of the Group.

Review of effectiveness of the Audit Committee

  • During the year, the Audit Committee completed a review of the effectiveness of external audit, Internal Audit and of the Audit Committee itself. This was conducted through a series of questionnaires. Internal Audit coordinated the review. The Committee was considered to be operating effectively and in accordance with the guidance recommended by the Smith Committee included in the UK Corporate Governance Code.
  • In addition to the questionnaire-based review of effectiveness, the Audit Committee also assessed the qualification, expertise and resources, and independence of the external auditors and the effectiveness of the audit process.
Simon Thompson

Simon Thompson, Chairman

Ann Grant

Ann Grant

David Bamford

David Bamford

Tutu Agyare

Tutu Agyare

Committee's role

The Committee reviews the composition and balance of the Board and Senior Executive team on a regular basis to ensure that Tullow has the right structure, skills and experience in place for the effective management of the Group's expanding business. This analysis is reviewed and discussed with the Board, with the aim of scheduling a progressive refreshment of the Board. It is the Committee's policy when conducting a search for a new Executive or a non-executive Director to appoint external search consultants to provide the Committee with a list of possible candidates against an agreed role and experience specification from which a shortlist is produced.

Main responsibilities

The main duties are:

  • Reviewing the structure, size and composition of the Board and making recommendations to the Board with regard to any changes required;
  • Succession planning for Directors and other senior executives;
  • Identifying and nominating, for Board approval, candidates to fill Board vacancies as and when they arise;
  • Reviewing annually the time commitment required of non-executive Directors; and
  • Making recommendations to the Board regarding membership of the Audit and Remuneration Committees in consultation with the Chairman of each Committee.

Committee membership

  • The Committee currently comprises four non-executive Directors and met on three occasions during 2012. Simon Thompson was Chairman of the Committee throughout the year. The membership and attendance of members at Committee meetings held in 2012 are shown in the Nominations Committee membership table. In addition to the three formal meetings, Committee members conducted a number of interviews, informal discussions and telephone conversations on various issues falling within its remit.
  • Aidan Heavey stood down as a member of the Nominations Committee on 31 December 2012 at the same time as Stephen McTiernan retired as a Director of the Company. Tutu Agyare was appointed to the Nominations Committee with effect from 1 January 2013.

Committee activities during 2012 and subsequent to the year-end

  • Board refreshment – In early 2012, in order to provide continuity during the transition of the Chairman, the Committee recommended to the Board that Steven McTiernan, the Senior Independent Director (SID), should continue in that role until 31 December 2012. Mr McTiernan retired from the Board on 31 December 2012 and was replaced as SID by David Bamford. The Committee has commenced a search for a new non-executive Director to replace Mr McTiernan. Spencer Stuart has been appointed to draw up a list of candidates against an agreed specification.
  • On 12 March 2012, the Board approved the recommendation of the Committee that Steve Lucas be appointed as a non-executive Director with effect from 14 March 2012 and as Chairman of the Audit Committee with effect from 16 May 2012, following the retirement of David Williams. The Zygos Partnership assisted with the search. Read Steve Lucas’ biography.
  • On 19 July 2012, the Board approved a recommendation by the Committee that Anne Drinkwater be appointed as a non-executive Director with effect from 25 July 2012. Curzon Partners assisted with the search. Read Anne Drinkwater’s biography.
  • Board diversity – The Board currently consists of five Executive Directors (including the CEO) and six non-executive Directors (including the Chairman). Two of the six non-executive Directors are women, but all of the Executive Directors are male, reflecting the relatively low level of gender diversity amongst the senior management of other companies in the oil and gas industry generally. In order to meet with the aspiration set out in the 2011 Davies Report ‘Women on Boards’ that women should make up 25% of board positions by 2015, we would have to restrict future Board appointments to women only or significantly restructure the size and composition of the Board. We do not regard either of these actions as being in the best interests of the Company. Accordingly, we will seek to address the problem of lack of diversity in senior management positions, as described in the Chairman’s Introduction to Corporate Governance, but recognise that we are unlikely to achieve our aspiration of 25% female representation by 2015.
  • Senior management succession planning – The Committee and the Board have been closely involved with Executive Directors in reviewing the senior management talent pool within Tullow. The aim is to ensure that all candidates, and particularly those who would increase the diversity of the senior management pool, have personal development plans designed to provide them with the knowledge and skills required to progress within the Group.
  • Board Committee membership – The Committee is responsible for nominating appropriate individuals for membership of the Board’s Committees. During the year, a number of changes were made to the composition of the Board Committees to ensure that they comprise of individuals with the necessary skills, knowledge and experience.
  • Committee evaluation – The performance of the Committee was evaluated as part of the annual Board evaluation exercise and was found to be operating effectively.
David Bamford

David Bamford, Chairman

Simon Thompson

Simon Thompson

Tutu Agyare

Tutu Agyare

Steve Lucas

Steve Lucas

Anne Drinkwater

Anne Drinkwater

Committee’s main responsibilities

  • Determining and agreeing with the Board the remuneration policy for the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Executive Directors and senior executives;
  • Reviewing progress made against KPI targets and agreeing incentive awards;
  • Reviewing the design of share incentive plans for approval by the Board and shareholders and determining the annual award policy to Executive Directors and senior executives under existing plans;
  • Within the terms of the agreed policy, determining the remainder of the remuneration packages (principally comprising salary and pension) for each Executive Director; and
  • Reviewing and noting the remuneration trends across the Group.

Committee’s advisers

The Committee invites individuals to attend meetings to provide advice so as to ensure that the Committee’s decisions are informed and take account of pay and conditions in the Group
as a whole. These individuals include:

  • The Chief HR Officer;
  • New Bridge Street (part of Aon plc) was appointed by the Committee in 2012. During this period, Aon provided certain insurance broking services to the Company, which the Committee did not believe prejudiced New Bridge Street’s position as its independent advisers. New Bridge Street replaced Kepler Associates; and
  • The Committee also consults with Tullow’s major investors and investor representative groups as appropriate. No Director takes part in any decision directly affecting his or her own remuneration. The Company Chairman also absents himself during discussion relating to his own fees.

Remuneration policy

The Group's policy is to ensure that remuneration is linked to Tullow's strategy and promotes the attraction, motivation and retention of the highest quality executives who are key to delivering sustainable long-term value growth and substantial returns to shareholders.

In light of widespread public concern about senior executive pay, and after consulting with major shareholders and shareholder representative bodies, the Committee proposes a radical overhaul of pay for our Executive Directors and senior managers for 2013 onwards.

The remuneration policy for 2012 and the proposed remuneration policy for 2013 can be found in the Directors' remuneration report in the 2012 Annual Report.